<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On finding interesting Ubiquity commands&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benatkin.com/weblog/2008/08/28/on-finding-interesting-ubiquity-commands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benatkin.com/weblog/2008/08/28/on-finding-interesting-ubiquity-commands/</link>
	<description>Ben Atkin&#039;s random thoughts on software development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:17:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben Atkin</title>
		<link>http://benatkin.com/weblog/2008/08/28/on-finding-interesting-ubiquity-commands/comment-page-1/#comment-42934</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Atkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 05:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benatkin.com/weblog/?p=95#comment-42934</guid>
		<description>Thanks for working on this! I think that adding tags is a simple and elegant way to get 90% of the functionality that I want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for working on this! I think that adding tags is a simple and elegant way to get 90% of the functionality that I want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abi</title>
		<link>http://benatkin.com/weblog/2008/08/28/on-finding-interesting-ubiquity-commands/comment-page-1/#comment-42334</link>
		<dc:creator>Abi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 04:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benatkin.com/weblog/?p=95#comment-42334</guid>
		<description>Agree with everything you say. I want to see more powerful commands too, beyond just pure search commands. Part of the solution for this is categorizing commands. Another thing we are also adding is the ability to create your own search commands using another command. This is good for the user because it is simpler to create your own searches rather than subscribing to others&#039; search command.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with everything you say. I want to see more powerful commands too, beyond just pure search commands. Part of the solution for this is categorizing commands. Another thing we are also adding is the ability to create your own search commands using another command. This is good for the user because it is simpler to create your own searches rather than subscribing to others&#8217; search command.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
